Responsa for Bava Kamma 227:12
לא שנו אלא עכו"ם משום דדייני בגיתי אבל לסטים ישראל כיון דאמרי מימר מייאש
IT WOULD BELONG TO HIM FOR THE OWNERS HAVE SURELY ABANDONED IT.<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' And as after the Renunciation on the part of the owner there followed a change of possession, ownership was transferred to the possessor. ');"><sup>19</sup></span> Said R. Ashi:<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' 'R. Assi' according to Asheri; cf. D.S. and supra p. 657, n. 11. ');"><sup>20</sup></span>
Explore responsa for Bava Kamma 227:12. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.